The Moral Argument, Part 5: Collision Movie
COLLISION – 13 min VIMEO Exclusive Sneak Peak from Collision Movie on Vimeo.
This is apparently just the first 13 minutes of the soon to be released movie. Here is a transcript of an important section from about the five to seven minute mark:
Hitchens: I am impressed with Douglas for this reason: very often when I debate with religious Jews, Christians, and Muslims, what they are trying to do is say, look, our morality is the same. So we agree on what is or is not moral. Its just we disagree about where it comes from. No, he understands very well: It is the will of God that is involved.
Wilson: I am a Christian. I take it on faith. I believe that faith provides me with the basis for rationality and I believe that my faith in God and his Word and his Christ provides me with an objective basis for moral considerations, moral values.
Hitchens: Pastor Wilson doesn’t make it easy on himself in that way. He imposes on himself and on others an unbelievably strenuous burden of worry and guilt. . . .
Wilson: People say look, are you a fundamentalist? Do you take the bible literally? The answer is no. But I believe it absolutely. This is a collection of 66 books written over centuries – many different genres, many different authors. And I believe it is our responsibility to study it, understand it, and understand what genre a particular book of the bible is. Is this history? Yes or no. Is this poetry? Yes or no. Is this prophetic enunciation? Is this epistolary? What is it? And then I believe it and accept it that way, on its own terms.
Hitchens: Whether the argument is celestial, or original [concerning the creation or earliest stage], social or political – any of these dimensions – it puts him and me, despite our good personal relations, on a side apart, divided from one another. There’s no bridge that can suffice. One of us not just has to lose the argument but has to admit real moral defeat. I think it should be him.
This last statement is worth repeating: One of us not just has to lose the argument but has to admit real moral defeat. I think it should be him.
I argue for the inherent immorality of Wilson’s moral argument for the existence of God in The Moral Argument, Part 4 .